Law aspirants challenge CLAT 2025 answer key in Supreme Court, seek stay on results

Two aspiring lawyers have petitioned the Supreme Court, contesting the CLAT 2025 provisional answer key and seeking a halt on results and counselling. They allege incorrect answers, arbitrary objection timelines, and exorbitant fees. Procedural lapses during the exam, including unequal time allocation for candidates, are also cited, raising concerns about fairness and constitutional rights.